PlumbingInformationSite.com
How it worksCost estimator
Get quotesFor contractors
MenuClose
  • How it works
  • Cost estimator
  • For contractors
GlossaryCost estimatorGet quotesFor contractorsList your businessAboutMethodologyUpdatesCorrectionsData policyContactSite map

Listings come from the federal USDOT registry, Google Business Profiles and state license lists.

Our directories: leaderexcavation.com, inspectree.com, plumbinginformationsite.com

  1. Utah
  2. /Sanpete County
  3. /Barclay Mechanical Services of Utah Inc

Barclay Mechanical Services of Utah Inc

Plumber or heating and cooling contractor in Manti, Sanpete County, UT

(435) 835-5084
595 West 100 North, Manti, UT 84642
Is this your business? Claim it free

Claimed listings rank first in Sanpete County and are the first we pass quote requests to.

Federal record

USDOT number
2320295
Status
Active carrier
Registered since
2012
Fleet
4 to 10 trucks

A USDOT number is the federal registration for companies that run commercial trucks. This record comes from the FMCSA registry. How we use it

About this contractor

Barclay Mechanical Services of Utah Inc registered with USDOT in 2012 and has held the registration for 14 years. Fleet on its registration: 4 to 10 trucks. It's one of 4 plumbers and heating and cooling contractors listed in Sanpete County.

Verify this record on FMCSA’s SAFER system (USDOT 2320295)

Get quotes from contractors in Sanpete County

One request instead of calling contractors one at a time. It's free.

Get free quotes

Map

Map of the 84642 ZIP code area in Manti, UT
Map shows the 84642 ZIP code area, not the exact address.

Other plumbers and heating and cooling contractors in Sanpete County

  1. Upside Heating & Cooling
    5.0 from 7 reviews via Google
    (435) 691-8642
  2. Utah Mechanical Heating and Air Conditioning
    4.9 from 250 reviews via Google
    (801) 797-3737
  3. Hills Heating and Air Conditioning Inc
    Gunnison
    (435) 528-3988

Listed from the federal USDOT registry. How listings are built

Something wrong? Request a correction